Hi Kenn,
For me, it 'is ok for 0.7.0.
For all partners 0.7.0, is-it ok
?
Yes, the purpose is to send the
attached zip with the CQ on friday 14.
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Tessier
Research Engineer
DRT LIST/DTSI/SOL/LISE
CEA-Saclay
91191 Gif sur Yvette
Cedex
Tel: 01 69 08 48 63
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Patrick. A couple of observations about version numbers:
1.
By
convention, the first version we usually use for components of MDT (and
other modeling projects) is 0.7.0 instead of 0.1.0.
2.
If
you expect the schema for DI files to change over the next few releases
of Papyrus, I’d suggest using 0.7.0 in the URI instead of 1.0.0; also,
to be more consistent with UML2, you may want the URI to be more like http://www.eclipse.org/papyrus/0.7.0/DI,
but it’s up to you.
Note
that nothing can be committed until the Eclipse legal team has
conducted its preliminary legal review (as per the parallel IP
process); so I assume you plan to attach a ZIP of the source to a
contribution questionnaire (CQ) on November 14?
Cheers,
Kenn
Hussey
Program
Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions
![[Embarcadero Technologies Logo]](jpghV3_AkmqbH.jpg)
Embarcadero
Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com
82 Peter Street, Second Floor | Toronto, ON M5V 2G5
Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Office: 416-593-1585 x9296 Mobile: 613-301-9105
I send you
slides that are notes of the precommitting meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------
Patrick
Tessier
Research
Engineer
DRT
LIST/DTSI/SOL/LISE CEA-Saclay
91191 Gif
sur Yvette Cedex
Tel: 01 69
08 48 63
www.papyrusuml.org
---------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mdt-papyrus.dev mailing list
mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-papyrus.dev