[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] M6/M7 interim Examples builds
|
Actually, there were changes! Did he not do a new build!?
Kenn
On 3/17/10, Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Agreed, James said there was no changes between M5 and M6.
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
> Software Development Manager
> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
> Phone: 613-270-4613
>
>
>
> |------------>
> | From: |
> |------------>
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |Alexander Igdalov <alexander.igdalov@xxxxxxxxx>
> |
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | To: |
> |------------>
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |"'MDT OCL mailing list'" <mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> |
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | Date: |
> |------------>
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |2010/03/17 12:00 PM
> |
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | Subject: |
> |------------>
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |RE: [mdt-ocl.dev] M6/M7 interim Examples builds
> |
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Yes, it was promoted after some time. Ed has successfully switched to UML2
> M6 in our next builds.
>
> Thus, I don't think we should respin our M6 to produce M6a - they seem to
> be identical.
>
> Cheers,
> - Alex.
>
> From: mdt-ocl.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:mdt-ocl.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 6:00 PM
> To: MDT OCL mailing list
> Subject: RE: [mdt-ocl.dev] M6/M7 interim Examples builds
>
>
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I see UML2 M6 was promoted this morning.
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx.
> Software Development Manager
> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
> Phone: 613-270-4613
>
>
> Inactive hide details for Alexander Igdalov ---2010/03/16 07:43:06 AM---Hi
> Ed,Alexander Igdalov ---2010/03/16 07:43:06 AM---Hi Ed,
>
>
> From: Alexander Igdalov <alexander.igdalov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> To: "'MDT OCL mailing list'" <mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Date: 2010/03/16 07:43 AM
>
>
> Subject: RE: [mdt-ocl.dev] M6/M7 interim Examples builds
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ed,
>
>> Very impressive speed on getting M6 out, though I think somehow you
> managed to promote before EMF.
>
> In fact there was no magic in our dependency on EMF M6, I started building
> OCL after it became available. Perhaps, your browser cache could show
> things
> in the reverse order...
> The only thing that worries me a little is the dependency on UML2 M5 (but
> UML2 M6 still isn't there...)
>
>> Did the release provoke the temporary buckybuild failure?
>
> Yes, I forgot to update the feature ID in the mdt-ocl.build file. The
> buckybuild recovered after I did it.
>
>> Now we can sort out what to do about builds to support the OCL Examples
> Editor.
>
> My +1 to approach b). BTW, have you asked Robert whether IMP is ok with the
> redistribution?
>
>> Alex: when we add editor tests, we want to make sure there is a two times
> expectation timeout on the build since UI tests can easily lock up with an
> unanswered "Do you want to delete XXX" popup or equivalent.
>
> Ok.
>
> Cheers,
> - Alex.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mdt-ocl.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mdt-ocl.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx.] On Behalf Of Ed Willink
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:24 PM
> To: MDT OCL mailing list
> Subject: [mdt-ocl.dev] M6/M7 interim Examples builds
>
> Hi All
>
> Very impressive speed on getting M6 out, though I think somehow you managed
> to promote before EMF. Did the release provoke the temporary buckybuild
> failure?
>
> --
>
> Now we can sort out what to do about builds to support the OCL Examples
> Editor.
>
> a) The approach that half works in
> https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-m2m-qvtd-0.8-nightly/79/
>
> Build against the IMP Update Site. This successfully compiles and packs an
> Update Site but fails prior to testing since the p2 install fails.
> The update site could be manually archived, but users need to install IMP
> Runtime first before installing MDT/OCL Examples.
>
> It may be that IMP fixes
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=303424
>
> promptly, but I think we can sympathise with a lack of enthusiasm for
> upgrading build procedures. We should expect a significant delay before the
> IMP developers migrate from Ganymede.
>
> b) The approach that works in
> https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-m2m-qvtd-0.8-nightly/70/
>
> Add IMP Runtime to the base editor feature and build so that IMP Runtime
> comes from SVN.
>
> This republishes IMP Runtime on the MDT/OCL Update site and so avoids the
> problem that the IMP Update Site is not p2-ready; there are no
> artifacts.jar
> and contents.jar
>
> When bug 303424 is fixed (by M7 if we're lucky) we might revert to a).
>
> With MDT/OCL being part of the Helios train and IMP not being, we might
> choose to stick with this approach so that the Helios modelling package
> does
> not have a dangling dependency on IMP.
>
> c) Do nothing
>
> No OCL Examples Editor in Helios.
>
> d) Other Ideas
>
> ---
>
> I would like some approval/lack of disapproval from other committers before
> changing Examples features to commit us to a now only slightly awkward IMP
> dependency.
>
> ---
>
> Alex: when we add editor tests, we want to make sure there is a two times
> expectation timeout on the build since UI tests can easily lock up with an
> unanswered "Do you want to delete XXX" popup or equivalent.
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
> mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
> mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
> mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
