|
Ed,
In short, I don't know why I am getting the message about
ocl20a. I am now investigating this.
As regards the tests, I suppose they failed because the
dependencies on the platform were those of M3. I have just updated
them.
I will now run another N build so that we get clean
results.
Regards,
- Alex.
Hi Alex
The CVS-triggered job on https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-mdt-ocl-3.0/72/
built successsfully but silently failed to run the tests, so failed.
Your
jobs on https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-mdt-ocl-3.0-integration/
keep failing becuase you haven't removed the reference to
org.eclipse.ocl20a.all. Is it in the job configuration that I can't
see?
Could the silent test failures be caused by a failure to import
JUnit4 into the build?
A fresh local install of Platform, EMF, UML2 M4,
with OCL from CVS runs fine, so the [4.5.0 5.0.0) tests range would seem ok (On
Windows with Sun Java 5).
Ed
Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
Alex
Ready to go.
With the common tests plugin now, the version
is exported to the others, so if the test fails. It's just the one manifest
that needs changing.
Ed
On 16/12/2009 07:39,
Alexander Igdalov wrote:
Hi Ed,
I see. Please ping me when you are
finished.
Regards,
- Alex.
Hi
Alex
I've just checked our JUnit ranges. They're going to fail. See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=297925.
I'll
commit a change in about 10 minutes that supports [4.5.0 5.0.0) preserving
Galileo functionality. If this fails then we need to go to
[4.7.0).
Regards
Ed
On 16/12/2009 07:30, Alexander Igdalov wrote:
Hi All,
I am very sorry for having confused the dates. I am
starting to build OCL 3.0.0 M4 right away.
Sorry for the inconvenience,
- Alex.
Alex,
Please respond.
Thanks,
Kenn
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue,
Dec 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [mdt.dev] Some reminders about
Helios M4 To: MDT developers < mdt.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Team,
Are we going to publish an OCL 3.0.0
M4?
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software
Development Manager
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
 Kenn Hussey ---2009/12/13 10:53:36 PM---Team, Please see the
email below, in particular #2. If your project is planning to participate
in the Helios release train, you
Team,Please see the email below, in particular #2. If your project is
planning to participate in the Helios release train, you must declare this
by updating the metadata for your project in the Portal. Please see
http://www.eclipse.org/helios/planning/EclipseSimultaneousRelease.php for the requirements that your project must meet in order to be on
the train.Cheers,Kenn---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: David M
Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Some
reminders about Helios M4
To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
1. its next Friday, 12/18!
2. That's the deadline for expressing intent to participate
in Helios, which is formally done by marking the simultaneousrelease flag
in Eclipse Portal (there's a Helios field to edit to "1"). The list
is currently (understandably) short, so I'll keep my eye on it, and send
more nag notes if expected teams don't mark soon.
modeling.amalgam
modeling.emf.compare
modeling.emf.eef
modeling.m2t.acceleo rt.jetty rt.swordfish stp.sca technology.egit
technology.subversive tools.ptp webtools
3. I suggest we
not "announce" our individual Project milestones until the Helios M4
date, 12/18. Of course, we need to announce on mailing lists, etc., for
our committers and adopters ... I just mean the general news items,
forums, and similar, targeted to general end-users asking for early
testing. That is what we have to do for the final release, and I
suggest we get in the habit of working "simultaneously" now, even during
milestones. Not a huge problem, but I do recall some issue in the past
where there were complaints or questions, because someone tried to update
part of their environment, but couldn't, since some other part had not
release an M4 version yet. Ends up being frustrating and making us appear
unorganized. (And we all know that's not true :)
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev
mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
mdt.dev
mailing list
mdt.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt.dev
_______________________________________________ mdt.dev
mailing list mdt.dev@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt.dev
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.108/2566 - Release Date: 12/15/09 07:52:00
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
|
