Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] MDT 2.0.0 vs OMG 2.0 / 2.2?

[Laurent Goubet <laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I'd also rather see us focus our efforts on supporting OCL 2.2 as best 
as can be instead of splitting the dev between the adoption of this new 
spec and the disambiguation/support of things that have changed since 
OCL 2.0.

The list of changes (as in "break") between the two versions might be 
limited enough for us to maintain both version at small cost ... but if 
this list becomes too large it will rapidly become an ordeal to make 
changes towards the adoption of 2.2.

Laurent

Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera a écrit :
> Relating the following bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/259031 recently 
> replied by Ed.
>
> I'm confused. Are we going to support both specification versions in 
> MDT-OCL 2.0.0?. I believe that it could be a chaos if we try tackle 
> that challenge.
>
> I think that must clearly specify what are we going to do, and update 
> the wiki with our ideas. We are 4 thinking heads who must align our 
> thoughts in the same way...
>
> >From my point of view, we must bury OMG OCL 2.0 specification and 
> change the implementation to adopt the new OCL 2.2 one. Keeping two 
> implementations to support both specifications doesn't seem to be 
> reasonable, in my opinion. If a client would like to use an OMG OCL 
> 2.0 compliant implementation instead of the new one, he just have to 
> use MDT OCL 1.3. What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Adolfo.
> --
>
> 	*Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera*
> adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com 
> <mailto:adolfosbh%28at%29opencanarias%28dot%29com>
> C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304
> 38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE
> Tel.: +34 922 240231 / +34 617 718268
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
> mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
>