| Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Transition Plan for MDT OCL and EMF "QTV" Components? |
|
I would like to sum some efforts in maintain the life (evolution and
maintenance) of this component, so I want to offer me as a committer. The major inconveniences which I could gather around being a MDT-OCL committer. - I don't have any experience as a committer in an Eclipse project. - Currently, my daily time to invest as a comitter is limited. - My knowledge around MDT-OCL project doesn't cover all the project corners. The list of reasons to be considered to be a MDT-OCL committer are the following: - I have been working on MDT-OCL project infrastructure for two years. - I have been contributing to the project raising enhancements/bugs/discussions and providing patches for some of them. - I have a profound knowledge about LPG, parser and analyser . - I'm an active member in the OMG OCL-RTF. - I have a partner here in Open Canarias, who is a committer in other Eclipse project, so I could receive some support from him. On the other hand, honestly, I don't think that I'm the suitable person to be a project leader, mainly, due to the the list of inconveniences which I have related. So I believe that another person with more experience and available time would rather be the project leader. I guess that there should be interested parties to assume this role. BTW, Although I'm not an Eclipse committer, Eclipse Foundation might hold a Committer Employer Consent Form, fulfilled by my company due to a previous contribution (the ecore-based QVTo metamodels). Finally, I would like to thank Christian Damus again for this labour on this project and to publicly encourage him not to - at least completely - leave this project. Regards, Adolfo. --
|
