Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdht-dev] Move to eclipse repository
Dave -
If you take a look at the update i have for develop - that added in all the poms for maven
if you have all the poms getting the automated build is relatively straight forward
are we building a update site or a complete product nightly
that is what i had not create the releng project and site etc

overall - the cda approach will be fine as long as we “freeze” cda in eclipse in the meantime

there was some changes to core - mostly regarding deleting and moving content within the uml editor

there was some issues i did run into with the adapters we can discuss on the call tomorrow

thanks

sean



On Feb 10, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Dave Carlson <dcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sean,

I want to get an automated nightly build of 'core' and 'fhir' modules running ASAP, so don't want to remove/replace the core module from eclipse git.  I've watched changes to github and did not see many in core, can the core files that were changed in github be replaced in eclipse git?  These 'core' module files have already been approved by Eclipse IP review.

As for 'cda' module, I know there are a lot of changes in github.  And the two new large contributions from NEHTA need review, and we'll need contributor info for all authors of those files.  It may be best to remove the 'cda' module and replace.  However, I would expect 2-3 weeks to submit a new contribution for the 'cda' replacement, especially given the large addition from original.


Can you refactor the cda plugins, including the 'core' plugins, but then use the current 'core' already in Eclipse git, with a few individual code changes that were made in github 'core'?

EclipseCon starts March 7th and I want 'core' and 'fhir' configured for Hudson build before then.  We may have to omit 'cda' for now.

Dave

Thank you,
  Dave Carlson, Ph.D.
  mobile: 406-253-3055
  Clinical Cloud Solutions LLC, healthcare on HL7 FHIR

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Sean Muir <sean.w.muir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave -
        As far as i can tell - there were a couple of minor tweaks to the cda and code plugins
If you can confirm that

http://git.eclipse.org/c/mdht/org.eclipse.mdht.git/log/core

http://git.eclipse.org/c/mdht/org.eclipse.mdht.git/log/cda

I was able to move those updates into our github mars release with no issues

If these were the extend of the changes - the best approach i see is to redo the steps you took to get them into eclipse
rename to eclipse, update licensing, make sure the java etc are all correct and redo the numbering

then we can - and i am not sure from a git perspective if there is an easier approach

remove the projects in eclipse code and cda and replace with the updated branch from git hub

if that works for you - do you have the steps you took to move to eclipse document or just make sure we build and run with new eclipse packages


This also raises a point we need to discuss - i think we need to keep the openhealthtools for cda model packages - do you know if that is going to be an issue with eclipse


thanks

sean


_______________________________________________
mdht-dev mailing list
mdht-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdht-dev

_______________________________________________
mdht-dev mailing list
mdht-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdht-dev

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Back to the top