Re: [m2m-iwg] Another standards body...

["Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, I like the fact that this group is focused on royalty-free standards. That is a big plus for open source implementations.

 

 

From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arlen Nipper
Sent: November-05-12 3:00 PM
To: m2m Industry Working Group
Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] Another standards body...

 

Oh YAS!!!  (Yet Another Standard) :-)

LOL Rick... it used to be the only standard was there were not standards. Now it seems the pendulum is swinging in the other direction.

 

On 11/5/12 1:57 PM, Rick Bullotta wrote:

“The best thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from”.

 

“Standards are like toothbrushes.  You know you need one, but you don’t want to use someone else’s”.

 

“Most open standards are neither open nor standard”.

 

 

From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:54 PM
To: m2m Industry Working Group
Subject: [m2m-iwg] Another standards body...

 

http://www.machinetomachinemagazine.com/2012/11/01/standards-group-formed-for-internet-of-things-growth/

 

Basically sounds like ARM and Neul Networks teaming up.

 

--
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper

_______________________________________________

m2m-iwg mailing list

m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg