| Re: [m2m-iwg] Information on MQTT/HTTP bridges and ideas |
Cool. Thanks. I don’t participate in the calls, so forgive me for any redundant queries or proposals… From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx That's what we have been discussing on the M2M IWG weekly calls - I was asked to share existing implementations that I was aware of to seed the discussion - I think Scott and Arlen have the initiative here, but I would need to double-check the meeting minutes to be sure. On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Rick Bullotta <rick.bullotta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I do think that before we suggest a specific implementation for integration with IFTTT (or any other external initiative), we consider defining some “best practices” around MQTT-REST integration (e.g. security is essential) as well as perhaps recommending some design guidelines for consistency between implementations. We could even use this opportunity to fill some of the holes in areas like discoverability, metadata, etc… Just a thought…. From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx More on REST/HTTP and MQTT bridges - this rather lovely presentation: and the associated new service: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Per the conversation on the M2M IWG call today - here are a bunch of resources around HTTP and MQTT http://m2m-eclipse.cloudfoundry.com is a version deployed againstm2m.eclipse.org https://lists.launchpad.net/mqtt-users/msg00094.html http://sensemote.com:8081 is an implementation of Toby's thoughts. -- --
-- |