[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [m2e-users] please test m2e 1.2 changes
|
Quite frankly, I am afraid that changing this will result in some odd
interference between jdt builder and m2e. I spent so much time
troubleshooting this kind of problems in the past, that I am trying to
avoid any risk of getting myself into this again. I just don't think the
little added eye-candy brings enough value to the project to justify the
risk.
Even workspace preference to control this behaviour I see as too much
effort for me given the value this feature brings (you need to consider
time it'd take me to review you patches, probably time to do legal
paperwork to accept the patches and then to maintain the code going
forward).
If you absolutely must change how jdt renders resource folders Package
Explorer, you can do this without changing m2e core. Just write project
configurator that extends m2e jdt stuff, override methods that deal with
resource folders and map your project configurator in your pom.xml...
and if this m2e extension proves to be safe and popular I may change my
mind ;-)
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-08-17 4:03 AM, Nord, James wrote:
Hi Igor,
Is the fact that JDT looks for this file a large problem (or a
significant performance hit)? If so would making this behaviour
configurable be an option (if it is at all possible)?
The problem I have is people are manually going in and removing the
"exclude **" after importing maven projects so they get the package
rendering behaviour they are used to - and we are all in agreement
that this is a bad thing to do. (so I'm going by the 80/20 rule - and
there seems to be no other API in which to do this).
Regards, >
/James
-----Original Message-----
From: m2e-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2e-users-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko
Sent: 17 August 2012 05:29
To: m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [m2e-users] please test m2e 1.2 changes
Your patch makes jdt traverse all resource folders looking for .m2e_ignored
file. Although in theory this should not change the end result, this is definitely a
change in processing that goes beyond pure visuals.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-08-16 10:57 AM, Nord, James wrote:
No you made a striking comment the resource processing must not be
handled by JDT.
To which I thought I made it clear in the response that the patch __does not
delegate any processing to JDT__**.
**unless you happen to have a file that is called ".m2e_ignored" which would
be processed by JDT.
/James
-----Original Message-----
From: m2e-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2e-users-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko
Sent: 16 August 2012 15:14
To: m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [m2e-users] please test m2e 1.2 changes
I thought I made it clear in my comment in the bug that the attached
patch is not good enough and there are no plans to accept it.
For better rendering of resources folders, proper solution likely
will only work with Common Navigator.
To actually delegate resource processing to jdt builder, it is
necessary to introduce new lifecycle mapping strategy that does not
create
excludes=** filter and suppresses maven-resource-plugin execution.
Complete implementation should also deal with pom.xml resources
includes/excludes configuration.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-08-16 9:41 AM, Nord, James wrote:
Bump (with patch)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=356568
/James
-----Original Message-----
From: m2e-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2e-users-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko
Sent: 16 August 2012 14:19
To: Maven Integration for Eclipse users mailing list; Maven
Integration for Eclipse developers mailing list
Subject: [m2e-users] please test m2e 1.2 changes
We are getting close to finishing m2e 1.2, which we plan to
contribute both to Kepler M1 and Juno SR1. Bugzilla query [1] shows
the list of the changes in this version and the current snapshot
build can be
installed from [2].
As usual, please ask any questions you have on the mailing list and
report any problems you find either here or through bugzilla.
Remember, we can't fix problems we don't know about ;-)
[1]
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?list_id=2636734&query_for
ma
t=advan
ced&product=m2e&target_milestone=Kepler%20M1
[2]
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/repositories/forge-
sites/m2e/1.2.0/N/LATEST/
________________________________
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster@xxxxxxx and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
m2e-users mailing list
m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users