Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [m2e-users] Packaging is POM but there's a compile in the house

Short answer is no.

packaging=pom is already used for two (!) primary purposes --
aggregation and configuration inheritance -- we did not find a way to
allowing any other use without breaking the primary purposes.


On 11-11-26 5:09 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
The cargo archetype sets up packaging=pom but then explicitly adds in
the compiler plugin and surefire and failsafe.

Is there any way to persuade M2E 1.0 to treat this as a Java-nature project?
m2e-users mailing list

Back to the top