Re: [lyo-dev] Fw: EDL license

[Axel Reichwein <axel.reichwein@xxxxxxxxx>]

Personally, I think that EDL is much more suitable than EPL if we want more developers to reuse Lyo code. 

Best regards,

Axel

2017-12-18 6:15 GMT-08:00 Jim Amsden <jamsden@xxxxxxxxxx>:

Andrew,
I don't know. It would appear all the eclipse/Lyo code is EPL and EDL, including the samples. Maybe someone on the dev list knows this history. I looked at the open source proposal that was approved inside IBM, and it only mentions EPL. Maybe it a comment block cloning issue, or something to widen the use of Lyo?



Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575

----- Forwarded by Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM on 12/18/2017 08:40 AM -----

From:        Andrii Berezovskyi <andriib@xxxxxx>
To:        Jad El-Khoury <jad@xxxxxx>, Jim Amsden <jamsden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        12/18/2017 08:34 AM
Subject:        EDL license

---

Hey,
 
Do you have an idea why the core libs (NOT the sample code) of Lyo are under EDL license? It was supposed to be only for the “example content”: https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Licensing_Example_Code.pdf
 
–Andrew.


_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev