Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [lyo-dev] Proposal: Remove non-OSLC4J Bugzilla adapter from Lyo
Open to suggestions on whether to keep it where it is or move it.  Originally it went in docs since it represented the final version of the workshop labs, but it has since evolved (OSLC query support + other improvements) and might be a better fit with the other sample adapters in the server repo.  I'll plan on moving it unless there is a good reason to keep it in docs.

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Samuel Padgett <spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1, I agree.

Is the plan to keep the adapter in the docs repository and simply remove the one in the server repository?
--
Best Regards,
Samuel Padgett | IBM Rational | spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx


Inactive hide details for Steve Speicher ---10/17/2012 09:28:24 AM---This makes good sense to me. The new OSLC4J-based one is Steve Speicher ---10/17/2012 09:28:24 AM---This makes good sense to me.  The new OSLC4J-based one is fairly complete and actively used.


    From:

Steve Speicher <sspeiche@xxxxxxxxx>

    To:

Lyo project developer discussions <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,

    Date:

10/17/2012 09:28 AM

    Subject:

Re: [lyo-dev] Proposal: Remove non-OSLC4J Bugzilla adapter from Lyo

    Sent by:

lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



This makes good sense to me.  The new OSLC4J-based one is fairly complete and actively used.

-- 
- Steve

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Michael Fiedler <fiedler.mf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    As part of the creation of the OSLC workshop, the Bugzilla sample
    adapter was re-factored/re-written using OSLC4J.  Lyo now has two
    Bugzilla adapters, the non-OSLC4J version in the
    org.eclipse.lyo.server.git repo and the OSLC4J version in the
    org.eclipse.lyo.docs.git repo (along with the rest of the workshop)

    Going forward it would be easiest to only maintain 1 version of the
    adapter.  Any objections or comments on removing the non-OSLC4J
    version?  Please respond on-list if you have a need for the non-OSLC4J
    version or have some argument for keeping it.   Of course, it won't be
    gone forever as Git magic can bring it back if needed.   I'll wait a
    week for any feedback.

    I've opened     https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=392162 to track this.

    Regards,
    Mike
    _______________________________________________
    lyo-dev mailing list
    lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
    http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev


_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev



_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev


GIF image

GIF image

Back to the top