Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:50:57 +0100
Delivered-to: lsp4e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/lsp4e-dev>
List-help: <mailto:lsp4e-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lsp4e-dev>, <mailto:lsp4e-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/lsp4e-dev>, <mailto:lsp4e-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0

On 12/06/2016 11:25 PM, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:

I see it in the dev console. The documentSymbols request has id=1 and the initialization has id=2, so I guess this is also the order. I will try to debug it.
I can't say if it causes issues, but I think it depends on if the server can handle the situation or not. The protocol doesn't specify if the first message isn't an initialisation.

Yeah, this seems unsafe.
Can you please report it in Bugzilla, with some steps to reproduce?

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers
My blog - My Tweets

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
  - From: Vlad Dumitrescu

References:
- [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
  - From: Vlad Dumitrescu
- Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
  - From: Vlad Dumitrescu

Prev by Date: Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
Next by Date: Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
Previous by thread: Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
Next by thread: Re: [lsp4e-dev] first impressions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs