Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] ASM 8 or 9?

I have switched Linux Tools target to use the RC1 Orbit repo and to specify the 9.0.0 versions of objectweb.asm.  It was
specifying 8.1.0 for M3.  Looking at a local build repository, there are only objectweb.asm 9.0.0 plug-ins.  Docker Tooling
is working in my testing.

Is there something else needed or should that fix the issue foir RC1?

-- Jeff J.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 5:29 PM Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Because of changes in simrel (Orbit p2 repo is directly available to simrel[1]) ASM 9 is being used by Linuxtools for 2020-12 M3 simrel and EPP, but ASM 8 is being used if you install linuxtools outside of Simrel.

If ASM9 does not work, changing Linuxtools target platform alone won't change what ends up being resolved. We probably need to update the com.github.jnr.ffi bundle in Orbit and normally Orbit publishes its RC2 around the same time Linuxtools publishes its RC1.


Jonah


On Wed., Nov. 25, 2020, 16:39 Jeff Johnston, <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The orbit repo for Linux Tools wasn't updated since M1, but that was an oversight.  We can update for RC1 to use the latest and greatest orbit (RC1).   If there
are issues and we have to back-level any packages, I'll post here.

-- Jeff J.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 3:49 PM Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Linux tools folks,

I have been continuing to unravel dependencies, especially about version constraints. Most of my work has been on JAXB because some uses cases of JAXB is failing since 2020-06.

While doing so I came across another case which only affects Linuxtools' docker support.

At the moment docker tooling depends on com.github.jnr set of bundles, which in turn depends on org.objectweb.asm. However the dependency only specifies a lower bound of 8.0.1 [1]. There is now a 9.x version in Orbit, but linuxtools builds against an older orbit.

Does it matter to Linuxtools which version of ASM is pulled in?


Thanks
Jonah


~~~
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Back to the top