[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [krazo-dev] Future of Krazo Nashorn extension
|
I would be fine with removing it, too. I guess people start using GraalVM instead for embedding JS code into Java apps. However, I also agree that this extension isn't heavily used. So removing it should be fine.
Hi Tobias,
I agree with removing it. I'll comment on the issue as well.
Ivar
Hi all,
today I had time to check the Jenkins builds an found a few issues. One of them is the extension running on the Nashorn engine. The engine was removed from the JDK in Java 15. now our tests are failing on JDK 17 and the extension is not able to run anymore.
Now I‘d like to discuss how to proceed with this problem.
IMHO the easiest way for us is to remove the extension in Krazo 3.0.0, so we don‘t have the problem to maintain some code building on obsolete APIs.
Another idea could be to add the engine as a external dependency if it‘s available as single archive. This won‘t break existing applications if there are any existing.
Personally, I‘d prefer the first idea, as I‘ve never seen any application relying on Nashorn and I don‘t think the extension has a future after the removal from the JDK.
What do you think about this? I already created a GitHub issue for this too, so please feel free to add your comments there.
Best regards,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
krazo-dev mailing list
krazo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/krazo-dev
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation
Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.
_______________________________________________
krazo-dev mailing list
krazo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/krazo-dev
--