|Re: [jwt-dev] WE contribution, Telco, OpenWide internal Wiki|
Hi Florian About discussion with EMO-IP team :about the"formal contribution mechanism" part : it means, did you accept and include in AgilPro code coming from the whole world, ex. bug patches ? If so, did you ask their authors to agree with the license then, and the epl now ?
About Open Wide and other SCOrWare partners contributions to JWT till end of January : I'm still not sure they will be fully (especially on the administrative side) ready by then.
In particular, there is the issue of third party dependancies. Regards, Marc Marc Dutoo wrote:
Hi Florian, Alain, allFully OK for a telco next week, especially in light of the upcoming release review !Would monday 14 jan at 15:00 pm be ok ? Happy new year to all of you also ! Regards Marc Alain BOULZE (INRIA) wrote:Hi Florain, Marc and all, On behalf of OW@INRIA team, I wish you a happy and successful new year !Shall we have a telco this or next week again? I think this would be highlyvaluable in order to discuss the current and upcoming issues (code contribution slides, presentations at EclipseCon, STP IM, etc.).next week should be fine for us. Best AlainBest regards, Florian@Marc only: Concerning the JWT/SCOrWare-wiki: I tried it several times, but with the combination FlorianLautenbacher/(password as sent) I don't get access to your wiki (on none of the pages). Could you please check thatagain? Thank you! --- Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ CC| | sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx | sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxxSeverity|new |awaiting_committer--- Comment #1 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-01-0210:51:00 --- Hi Florian:We have a few questions for your regarding this contribution that we hopeyou can help us understand before we move forward; 1. Did all contributors of the code on the Sourceforge project(AgilePro)agree to the license change to EPL from GPL? We note that Emundo GMBH appears to be involved in this project as well which we will need tounderstand?2. Did the AgilePro project have a formal contribution mechanism in place?3. Are Christian Seitz and Christian Saad employed by the University or arethey students?Based on your response to these questions, we will be able to decide how to move forward. We must ensure that all contributors of the original code agree to the license change and we further need to ensure and understand thepedigree of the original code.Should I be misunderstanding the intent of your contribution or should you wish to discuss further, please do not hesitate to contact me via telephone.Regards, Sharon -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Montag, 7. Januar 2008 11:30 An: lautenbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [CQ 1936] technology.jwt initial contribution http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1936Florian Lautenbacher <lautenbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:What |Removed |Added---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------Severity|awaiting_committer |new --- Comment #2 from Florian Lautenbacher <lautenbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-01-07 05:30:08 --- Hi Sharon, the project AgilPro was a joint project of the University of Augsburg,Germany, together with the company eMundo GmbH which has been sponsored bythe High-tech initiative future Bavaria.The project ended in December 2007, and all code concerning the workflow editor has only been implemented by the Unviersity of Augsburg (myself and students of mine such as Christian Seitz and Christian Saad). Other parts of the project have been developed together with staff of eMundo GmbH or onlyby eMundo GmbH. But these are not part of this contribution.However, all project partners of AgilPro (meaning the staff of the our lab at the University of Augsburg as well as staff of eMundo GmbH) agreed to move to Eclipse and hence to change the license from GPL to EPL for theWorkflow Editor part.I'm unsure what you mean by "formal contribution mechanism": is there a link explaining that? The code has been implemented based on EMF and GEF, using a Bugzilla and SVN of the University and the students got their work packages according to predefined project plans as well as regarding incoming bugsfrom companies who are using the tool suite AgilPro. Still the tool AgilPro is available as a SourceForge project(http://sf.net/projects/agilpro) under the GPL, which includes the JWT-WE(now under EPL) and enhances this with several parts (RCP, additional plugins, code generation, etc.). To our opinion this should not be a problem, are we right?Currently, only the mentioned students and myself are working on the code of JWT WE - however, gathering feedback from the whole JWT community. This will probably change during this year, when the other partners of the JWT projectwill join the development of JWT Workflow Editor (now focused more on necessary transformations). Best regards, Florian --Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi? tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC listfor the CQ. _______________________________________________ jwt-dev mailing list jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev_______________________________________________ jwt-dev mailing list jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
Back to the top