Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jetty-users] Project Loom + Jetty

I was able to stand up a "tech demo" quality version of Jetty + Jackson + RESTEasy over Loom that seemed to work almost out of the box, and that was over a year ago, so hopefully the experience has only improved since!  I keep meaning to brush the dust off and get it working again...  My organization plans to be an early adopter of Jetty + Loom but we are waiting for it to be GA before we invest a ton of time in it.

On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 5:29 AM Simone Bordet <sbordet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tamás Cservenák <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello there,
> just a cursory question, as I hope to get some direct links or even some contact to folks trying it out.
> Recently was reading
> And that lead me to this preso (and related ML communications)
> So, if I get it correctly, they "just" replaced QTP with Loom enabled one? And the premise is that you avoid all the complications of async/continuation/etc and "just" do sync request processing (good ole sync servlet api pre async stuff)?
> Anyone can shed some light or anything more about this?
> (I am aware there is no "silver bullet", but this intrigued me)

Yes, the potential that Loom brings seems to simplify a lot the
programming model for common cases.

We have yet to dive into this, but we plan to do it in the near
future, probably in a separate repository (that will require a JVM
that supports Loom).

Simone Bordet
Developer advice, training, services and support
from the Jetty & CometD experts.
jetty-users mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top