[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jetty-users] Project Loom + Jetty
|
I was able to stand up a "tech demo" quality version of Jetty + Jackson + RESTEasy over Loom that seemed to work almost out of the box, and that was over a year ago, so hopefully the experience has only improved since! I keep meaning to brush the dust off and get it working again... My organization plans to be an early adopter of Jetty + Loom but we are waiting for it to be GA before we invest a ton of time in it.
Hi,
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tamás Cservenák <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> just a cursory question, as I hope to get some direct links or even some contact to folks trying it out.
>
> Recently was reading
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpressler/loom/loom/sol1_part1.html
>
> And that lead me to this preso (and related ML communications)
> https://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/ec-public/materials/2019-05-15/Loom_Overview_May2019.pdf
>
> So, if I get it correctly, they "just" replaced QTP with Loom enabled one? And the premise is that you avoid all the complications of async/continuation/etc and "just" do sync request processing (good ole sync servlet api pre async stuff)?
>
> Anyone can shed some light or anything more about this?
> (I am aware there is no "silver bullet", but this intrigued me)
Yes, the potential that Loom brings seems to simplify a lot the
programming model for common cases.
We have yet to dive into this, but we plan to do it in the near
future, probably in a separate repository (that will require a JVM
that supports Loom).
--
Simone Bordet
----
http://cometd.org
http://webtide.com
Developer advice, training, services and support
from the Jetty & CometD experts.
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
