[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jetty-users] Unix socket performance numbers
|
Greg,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> So here are some numbers using ab with keep alive option:
>
> HTTP :8080 98634.66 [#/sec] 117224.98 [Kbytes/sec]
> HTTP :8888 67073.40 [#/sec] 79715.16 [Kbytes/sec]
> HTTPS:8443 23622.46 [#/sec] 28074.74 [Kbytes/sec]
> HTTPS:8843 52365.51 [#/sec] 62235.18 [Kbytes/sec]
Uhm.
Proxying via HAProxy seem to slow down clear-text HTTP by 30%. That
seems *a lot* to me.
Are you offloading TLS at HAProxy and then forwarding the clear-text
bytes to backend ?
So the TLS numbers are actually measuring the difference in TLS
implementations ?
If you're not offloading TLS at HAProxy, then how come passing raw
bytes to the backend yields such a difference (lose 30% for clear-text
bytes, *gain* 100% for encrypted bytes) ?
--
Simone Bordet
----
http://cometd.org
http://webtide.com
Developer advice, training, services and support
from the Jetty & CometD experts.
