Re: [jetty-users] Generic way to add all Jetty jars as Maven dependencie

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Added the jetty-all aggregate back into the mix for jetty-9, should be in M3

we are only going to run with the one aggregate for the time being,
we'll see about adding back in the others on a case by case basis...if
someone can make the case for one :)

cheers,
jesse


--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx


On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FWIW, I use the following in Ivy:
>
> <dependency org="org.eclipse.jetty.aggregate" name="jetty-all" conf="..."
> rev="8.1.3.v20120416" />
>
> Please don't take that away in version 9. We depend on a lot of components
> as it is, the last thing I need is to cherry jars from another project that
> decides for me that it's better to have a gazillion little jars instead of
> one.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> That said, jetty-webapp will get you the majority of dependencies via the
>> transitive resolution system.
>>
>> --
>> Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> webtide.com
>> Developer advice, services and support
>> from the Jetty & CometD experts
>> eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jesse McConnell
>> <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> for jetty 9 I presume? we are sorting out gettings those wired back up
>>> into release in some form, likely for next milestone
>>>
>>> personally I recommend depending on what you need and letting maven
>>> handle all the transitive things.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> jesse
>>>
>>> --
>>> jesse mcconnell
>>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:41 PM, ccleve <ccleve.tech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > Is there a simple way to add all of the jetty jar files to my Maven
>>> > project
>>> > as dependencies? There used to be jetty-aggregate and jetty-all, but I
>>> > don't
>>> > see that now.
>>> >
>>> > I tried to add jetty-distribution as a <type>pom</type> dependency, but
>>> > it
>>> > wouldn't resolve properly.
>>> >
>>> > For now, I'm just adding all the modules as individual dependencies,
>>> > but
>>> > there are a lot of them.
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > jetty-users mailing list
>>> > jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jetty-users mailing list
>>> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-users mailing list
>> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@xxxxxxxxx | ggregory@xxxxxxxxxx
> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0
> Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>