[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jetty-users] Jetty SPDY use split package?
|
On Thursday, 20 September 2012, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Yes, that's correct.That's what the websocket-core renamed packages are now. (org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.*)
So we can prevent the package space overlap concerns in OSGi.
I don't think we need to be so verbose to avoid overlaps.
If you remove core from the package, then the resulting names do not overlap with other modules:
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.annotations
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.driver
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io.*
I do not think there is an OSGi restriction of one jar/module producing more than one package
I strongly think we should drop the "core" as a meaningless artifact of our build system.
cheers
--
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Greg Wilkins
<gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The packages for websocket are now a bit verbose. Server and client
are ok, but core produces:
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.annotations
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.api
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.api.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.driver
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.extensions
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.extensions.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.io
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.io.*
Can't this just be:
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.annotations
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.driver
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io.*
So long as no other module/jar contains any of these packages we are good.
--
Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.webtide.com
Developer advice and support from the Jetty & CometD experts.
--
Greg Wilkins <
gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.webtide.comDeveloper advice and support from the Jetty & CometD experts.
