Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow

From: Till Brychcy <register.eclipse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:15:18 +0200
Delivered-to: jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-dev>, <mailto:jdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jdt-dev>, <mailto:jdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

+1 to get rid of auto-closing 

On one hand, we encourage users to participate in eclipse and a first step is to file bugs.

But at least I as a bug-author absolutely HATE  it if bugs that I invested time to write are auto-closed.

This is everything but encouraging.

I’ve also seen others on twitter complain about it.

(if anybody cares, I think this practice should also be ended on Platform)

Notifications on stale bugs don’t matter, because they can be deleted without worrying if the bugs don’t get closed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Mickael Istria

References:
- [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Stephan Herrmann
- Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Daniel Megert
- Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Stephan Herrmann
- Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Stephan Herrmann
- Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Daniel Megert
- Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
  - From: Andrey Loskutov

Prev by Date: Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
Next by Date: Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
Previous by thread: Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
Next by thread: Re: [jdt-dev] Buffer overflow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs