Summing up, I think we have a majority vote for Jakarta REST, so shall we go ahead and make that official?
We had a similar issue with Jakarta Faces, which accidentally got named Jakarta Server Faces for a short while. It was fairly easy to correct that. There too, having Jakarta Server Faces as an official name and then Jakarta Faces as the real name simply didn't add anything for anyone.
Additionally, with having simple names (Jakarta Faces, Jakarta Transactions, Jakarta Persistence, ...) people don't feel the need to start using cryptic abbreviations. Cryptic abbreviations are very unfriendly to new people, so best avoided.
Projects generally have a full name and a short name. Currently,
Jakarta RESTful Web Services has a short name, restful-ws. This
name first appears (to me) about the time we were getting RESTful
web services 2.1 ready for ballot (Jul-Sep 2019).
I'm +1 on moving away from JAX-RS since that's fading further and
further in the rear-view mirror.
I'm supposing we aren't interested in changing the package name
-- sticking with jakarta.ws.rs. In a perfect world, I think it
would be nice if the repository and package name lined up but,
that seems in-opportune right now (i.e. repository were to become
restful-ws and the package name were to change to
jakarta.restful_ws or jakarta.restful.ws. (or replace restful with
rest, etc.)
If this is the direction the group decides to go in, we should
update the name of the GitHub repository as well as the name of
the PMI project page (currently
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.jaxrs). For me, getting
the PMI project page, the repository, and it's associated web-page
all aligned with the 'short-name' that the Spec. directory uses
would be nice. I don't see this as something super urgent though.
I am certain all the jaxrs names are just hold-over legacy. The
team can decide if it wants to use 'rest' or 'restful-ws' or
anything else that can be consistently applied. Maybe the 4.0
release is the right time for doing this.
-- Ed
On 11/23/2021 9:49 AM, Markus Karg
wrote:
I
do not see the confusion. IMHO most people are able to
understand that "Jakarta REST" simply is a short from of
"Jakarta RESTful Web Services".
-Markus
Von:
jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Santiago Pericasgeertsen Gesendet: Montag, 22. November 2021 15:29 An: jaxrs developer discussions Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] [External] : Re: Jakarta
REST 3.1.0
Sounds great! Should
we take the opportunity to change the
name officially into Jakarta REST, doing
away with the longer name that no one
ever uses or even can remember exactly?
I plan to create the final 3.1.0 jars
for Jakarta 10 and push them to Staging
in the next day or two. TCK work will
likely continue for a bit longer, but in
the meantime we can submit the spec PR
and get the approvals we need.