So let's stay with JAX-RS. ;-) -Markus Von: jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Christian Kaltepoth
Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. September 2019 11:11
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] Use of "Jakarta REST" on Jakarta EE tutorial I would prefer to have a short name for the spec hat is used in a consistent way. Mixing Jakarta REST and JAX-RS all the time is very confusing. As mentioned before, I would prefer to keep the JAX-RS short name. But that's just my opinion. As a JAX-RS Committer I think you are free to decide that. But you should talk with those that defined overall Jakarta tutorial, maybe they want special wording. -Markus I'm working on migrating the Java EE tutorial to Jakarta EE terms. In the absence of a new acronym or short name, that means replacing 140 JAX-RS mentions with "Jakarta RESTful Web Services". I wonder, would it be acceptable to informally use "Jakarta REST" on those places where JAX-RS was used? This would be consistent with uses of "Faces pages" for JSF or "enterprise beans" for EJB. As opposed to the spec, the tutorial is a non normative document. The only reason I'm asking this is to reduce verbosity. Guillermo González de Agüero _______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
-- |
