[jakartaee-tck-dev] Implementation-specific runners

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jakartaee-tck-dev] Implementation-specific runners

From: David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:25:48 -0700
Delivered-to: jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakartaee-tck-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:jakartaee-tck-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev>, <mailto:jakartaee-tck-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakartaee-tck-dev>, <mailto:jakartaee-tck-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Perhaps we should rethink this when time allows:

 - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/942

What do we think about eventually putting this kind of thing in a repository dedicated to running GlassFish?  Possibly owned by GlassFish.


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Implementation-specific runners
  - From: Scott Marlow

Prev by Date: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] compatibility alert: Do (Platform TCK) tests that use Faces need CDI to be enabled (perhaps via empty beans.xml)?
Next by Date: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] compatibility alert: Do (Platform TCK) tests that use Faces need CDI to be enabled (perhaps via empty beans.xml)?
Previous by thread: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Should Platform TCK tests that include Managed Beans be removed from the EE 10 Platform or updated to include an empty beans.xml?
Next by thread: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Implementation-specific runners
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs