[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [jakartaee-platform-dev] Stable location of GF 6 used to pass TCK?
 | 
  
  
    Hi Steve,
    We have a recent run of full platform TCK at job[1],  Junit
      report [2] and embedded job with logs [3]. 
      
      This test run was aborted midway affecting only jpa_stateful3
      tests as the glassfish start domain failed for those. Hence
      jpa_stateful3 is rerun in [4] , results will be available soon.
    [1]
      https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/2/
      [2]
https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/2/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
      [3]
https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/blue/organizations/jenkins/jakartaee-tck/detail/master/820/
    [4]
      https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/3/
    Thanks & Regards,
      Alwin Joseph
    
    On 21/07/20 8:47 pm, Alwin Joseph
      wrote:
    
    
      
      Hi Steve,
      The standalone TCKs with consistent failures are present at
        [1].
      authentication-tck : 1 signature test (need to verify the
        signatures with the current jars in glassfish)
        restful-ws-tck : 2 failures (https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/issues/23122
        )
        security-tck : 5 test failures (https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/issues/23130
        will probably address most)
        websocket-tck :1 signature test ( https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/issues/23128
          )
          
        
      The platform TCK will have more failures and we do not have a
        recent test run for those.
      
      [1]
        https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-standalonetck-certification/56/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
      Thanks & Regards,
        Alwin Joseph
      On 21/07/20 5:33 pm, Alwin Joseph
        wrote:
      
      
        
        Hi Steve,
        I will send a detailed report of test run status.
        
        For the initial waves(wave 0 & wave 1), we have 1 signature
        test failure in Websocket TCK when run with glassfish (issue : https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/issues/23128)
        
        Regards,
        Alwin
        
        On 21/07/20 2:18 pm, Steve Millidge
          (Payara) wrote:
        
        
          
          
          
          
            I’d like to get to an
                understanding of where we are on TCK testing. What
                suites pass, which have a small number of failures and
                which have a large number? That way I can seek
                volunteers to focus on each test suite.
             
            If a number of specs,
                currently pass their TCK, and  need a milestone release
                to reference in their spec compliance PRs, we can create
                one and  that way we can have a download for them to
                point to. However I don’t want to do this spec by spec.
             
            I will raise at the
                platform dev meeting today.
             
            Steve
             
            
             
            
              
                
                  
                   
                  
                    
                    
                      
                    
                    
                      I can update something there
                        too, but I'll wait for some of the other
                        GlassFish committers to agree with that.
                     
                    
                    
                      
                        It should also be ok to upload it in a Github
                          release if that is more stable. In this case
                          the bundle will be considered final I believe.
                          
                       
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                      
                    
                    
                    
                      Yes, that's the same URL I've
                        been using.
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                   
                 
               
             
           
        
        
        
        _______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
      
      
      
      _______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev