Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Review help of CCR for Jakarta EE 11 Platfo

[Arjan Tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I always wondered about the true use and need to duplicate large parts of the CCR and the TCK results page. The entire header with all the lines (Organization Name, Product name) is a direct copy / paste of each other. Whenever one gets updated, we need to be sure to update the other too.

Maybe for the next release (EE 12) we should establish that the result page only consists of the section that's now labeled "Test counts per TCK"? 

On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 07:47, Ivar Grimstad via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Please help me review the CCR for Jakarta EE 11: https://github.com/jakartaee/platform/issues/1107

A question:

Is it sufficient to list the sha256's of the additional TCKs on the TCK results page, or do they also need to be duplicated in the issue? 

I think it is, so this CCR should be ready to approve. But please state your objections if you don't agree so we can ask the GlassFish project to update the CCR.

Ivar

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev