| Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [jakartabatch-dev] Jakarta Batch + CDI integration POLL results |
Copying Tanja and Ivar. Could you kindly help us get the word out
during JakartaOne?
Reza,
Please by all means, try to push for more results. Maybe there's a way to publicize via Jakarta One this week?
If we get any more I'll update the PR capturing the details.
I'd just sent that out noticing the count seems to have stopped (it's still at 63, same as when I sent the email).
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------
Scott Kurz
WebSphere / Open Liberty Batch and Developer Experience
skurz@xxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------
"Reza Rahman" ---12/04/2021 12:35:46 PM---Scott, It’s OK to move forward with status quo. Shouldn’t we wait a bit for the results though? Less
From: "Reza Rahman" <reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "jakartaee-platform developer discussions" <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/04/2021 12:35 PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartabatch-dev] [jakartaee-platform-dev] Jakarta Batch + CDI integration POLL results
Sent by: "jakartabatch-dev" <jakartabatch-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Scott,
It’s OK to move forward with status quo.
Shouldn’t we wait a bit for the results though? Less than a hundred votes is very low still and I was going to do a final push since my understanding is that the votes are open until December 15?
Can you let me know so I can plan accordingly?
Reza Rahman
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
From: jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Scott Kurz <skurz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 10:19 AM
To: jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Jakarta Batch + CDI integration POLL results
I think we can report the results now (though I didn't explicitly list an end date, the responses seem to have stopped):
Total responses: 63
Option 1 - Adopt the current/legacy Platform spec approach 22 % (14/63)
Option 2 - Formalize the Batch Status quo - 22 % (14/63)
Option 3 - A new direction - make everything a CDI bean 56% (35/63) ----
So I suggest two actions.
1. As mentioned earlier https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg02989.html, for Batch 2.1 and EE 10 we codify the status quo (go with option 2), since that is essentially already supported by the existing implementations that do offer CDI integration
2. Going forwards we open a platform-level discussion to consider the Option 3, make everything a bean approach winning the majority of votes (which again, REST is considering).
For this I opened: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/441
And again, a key point this whole discussion has brought up is this should really be a platform-level effort and decision. Romain brought up several challenges/objections which seemed persuasive to me ... so if the Platform wants this badly enough, we'll have to deal with that collectively.
Thanks all for your thoughts and efforts..and for bearing with all these emails
------------------------------------------------------
Scott Kurz
WebSphere / Open Liberty Batch and Developer Experience
skurz@xxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
jakartabatch-dev mailing list
jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartabatch-dev
_______________________________________________ jakartabatch-dev mailing list jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartabatch-dev