Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [jakartaee-tck-dev] [glassfish-dev] GlassFish RC2

Correct, Lukas.  But, as long as these components have staged their final versions of the APIs, then Steve should still be good.  If an issue is raised with one of these staged APIs, then we will have to adjust.  But, we should feel comfortable with using the staged APIs at this point.

Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    

From:        Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steve Millidge (Payara)" <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        11/01/2020 18:59
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [glassfish-dev] GlassFish RC2
Sent by:        jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

On 11/1/20 6:26 PM, Steve Millidge (Payara) wrote:
> I have cut an RC2 of GlassFish today. This has the final version of all
> the Jakarta APIs. IMHO this should be the version we should focus on as
> the Compatible Implementation of Jakarta EE to get the platform
> specification to ballot and Jakarta EE released.

agree. Only note that release reviews for some specs/APIs should
conclude on Wed Nov 4, so they cannot be pushed to central before that day.

> <>
> <>
> For GlassFish to get to a final release I would like to incorporate
> final released (in maven central) versions of all the Compatible
> Implementation projects e.g Jersey, EclipseLink, Tyrus etc. and all the
> GlassFish sub-components e.g. HK2, Grizzly, CORBA etc. however I think
> this can follow the Jakarta EE release. Maybe in time for livestream.

What is the deadline for these CIs to be in central? Given that release
review can conclude on 1st and 3rd Wed of the month and should be
running for a week, I'm not sure a date before Nov 18 is reachable,
unless release reviews for all of remaining CIs are set to conclude this
Wed, Nov 4.

> The reason I think these can follow is that all the Eclipse components
> are going to have to have a release review and appear in maven central
> before they can be incorporated into GlassFish Final and the timelines
> of that are out of control of the GlassFish project.
> On a related point I want to cut final versions of GlassFish dependent
> components that are in the control of the GlassFish project and put them
> out for release review e.g. HK2, Shoal, HA-API, JSF-templating and
> Woodstock. Does anybody object to releasing those as is?

I have no objections.


> Thanks
> *Steve Millidge
> Director and Founder
> Payara Services Ltd*/
> /*/Payara Enterprise – Software, Security, Stability, Support./***
> E: steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx <
mailto:steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> |US:
> +1 415 523 0175 |UK: +44 207 754 0481 |M: +44 7920 100626
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Payara Services Limited, Registered office: Unit 11, Malvern Hills
> Science Park, Geraldine Road, Malvern, WR14 3SZ
> Registered in England and Wales: 09998946 | VAT: GB 193854467 |
> <> |
> info@xxxxxxxxxxx <
mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxx> | @Payara_Fish
> <>
> /If at any time you would like to unsubscribe from
> Payara communications, simply respond to this email with 'Unsubscribe'
> in the title, or instantly unsubscribe from all types of communication
> //here./
> <>
> _______________________________________________
> glassfish-dev mailing list
> glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top