|Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Fair rules for "optional" TCKcompliance tests|
None of the changes in the JESP replace an entire chapter of the EFSP, so we would have to "fork" at least a whole paragraph with the risk of getting out of sync if that was later changed, otherwise, I guess we could, but adding new content that isn’t in the parent spec is of course easier than such fork.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
But the EFSP is extended by the JESP. Cannot the JESP be updated without board involvement?
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 8:44 PM Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Back to the top