[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] RMI-IIOP and CORBA
|
I agree it would be better to be explicit about it in the release plan although it is somewhat implicit. What does that mean for votes currently ongoing though?
-----Original Message-----
From: jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Bill Shannon
Sent: 10 January 2020 03:06
To: jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakartaee-platform-dev] RMI-IIOP and CORBA
I just realized that the Jakarta EE 9 Release Plan doesn't say anything
explicit about RMI-IIOP or CORBA. They are both removed from JDK 11,
and Jakarta EE 9 explicitly removes EJB interoperability, which depends on RMI-IIOP, but nothing is said about RMI-IIOP or CORBA themselves.
My original Jakarta EE 9 proposal was explicit that RMI-IIOP and CORBA would not be included. I think we should update the current plan to make this explicit as well.
Note that this means any product providing backwards compatibility will need to provide a complete ORB and RMI-IIOP support, including the javax.rmi APIs. (The javax.rmi APIs would not be migrated to the jakarta namespace.)
Comments?
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
