Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [POLL] Would you support the as-is javax JA

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We would ...
a) leave the `javax` versions of
JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation in your future Jakarta EE 9 implementation


---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:
       David
Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       jakartaee-platform
developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       12/03/2019
04:00
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
[jakartaee-platform-dev] [POLL] Would you support the as-is javax JAXB
and JAX-WS in your implementation
Sent
by:        jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

An informal poll for the implementations.
 I think we might be all saying the same thing differently.

Let's say that Jakarta EE 9 doesn't "include" JAXB, JAX-WS or
Activation, whatever "include" means.

Will you then:

 a) leave the `javax` versions of JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation in your future
Jakarta EE 9 implementation
 b) put the work into removing `javax` versions of JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation
and ship your future Jakarta EE 9 implementation without them


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
310-633-3852

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev