|Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] lassNotFoundException: com.sun.mail.util.PropUtil when using javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress|
Hi Bill,In that specific failing test the goal ist to check if our logic is returning the correct InternetAddress oobjects based on entries within a database by using a public static API method of InternetAddress. Also I would then implement those parts of the implementation within the test project though.
I would expect of a API to not throw any ClassNotFound exception when creating any of the provided classes. I accept to get any exceptions of type "no implementation found" of course...
In my case the test szenario we pass an String containing multiple Email addresses delemited by a custom delemitor. And we want to test if those addresses have been correctly parsed....
Wintin the tested Logic the method javax.mail.internet.InternetAddresses.create(String) is being called, wich leads to an error with the JakarataEE API and DOES work with the JavaEE API artifact.
Anyway, My pont is the I not expect that API does refer classes of the API implementer.
-Patrick On 2019-10-18 08:54, Bill Shannon wrote:
If your unit test depends on all of Jakarta EE being available for testing, then you're going to need to find a way to do the unit testing by running a complete app server as a separate program; no set of jar files is likelyto do that for you.If your unit test depends on only some of the APIs from Jakarta EE, then depending on which APIs you might be able to find a standalone implementationof those APIs that you can run inside the unit testing framework.In particular, if you are trying to do unit testing that depends on Jakarta Mail, you can use the com.sun.mail:jakarta.mail jar file for testing, whichcontains a complete implementation of Jakarta Mail. Patrick Reinhart wrote on 10/17/19 11:37 PM:The problem happens in test phase of our build after the compilation. But comparing the both libraries (old and new one) those where different content wise. It is just that the current behavior has changed now...What would be the correct unit test dependency in that case? Best regards PatrickAm 18.10.2019 um 05:03 schrieb Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Back to the top