Re: [jakartabatch-dev] Home for jbatch-arquillian-extension ? TCK Runner

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Interesting suggestion,
Arjan.  Do you think moving it over to Eclipse will create more buzz
and more contributors?  Or, were you thinking of forking it over to
Eclipse?  In either case, you might consider running the idea by Scott
Stark since I see that he was one of the more recent committers and he's
very active with Jakarta EE.  Scott Marlow might have some thoughts
on this as well.  

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       "arjan
tijms" <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
       "jakartabatch
developer discussions" <jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       09/15/2021
05:39
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakartabatch-dev] Home for jbatch-arquillian-extension ? TCK Runner
repos?
Sent
by:        "jakartabatch-dev"
<jakartabatch-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Hi,

Maybe one step further, what about seeing
if we can move Arquillian-core itself over to Eclipse and maintain it
as the official TCK connector?

Arquillian core at its current location
hasn't seen that much activity: https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-core/graphs/contributors

WDYT?

Kind regards,
Arjan

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:30 PM Scott
Kurz <skurz@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Following Ondro's
lead,   I can appreciate separating out the Arquillian extension and
the "TCK runner" modules from the core TCK .. but.. where then
to put them?

I can imagine the TCK doc will probably want to reference a runner as an
example.  

I suppose we could ask to start a new ee4j GitHub repo, not sure it's worth
it.    I'm not completely convinced we shouldn't just roll this
into the batch-tck repo in fact as another couple of modules (with
the down side of polluting the commit history with updates unrelated to
the core).

If no one is too especially interested, I could see myself probably building
on Ondro's example and cleaning this up a bit and adding a runner project
the:  https://github.com/WASdev/standards.jsr352.jbatch repo.
(It'd probably be geared mostly towards Open Liberty and Glassfish, at
least to start.)

Ondro, did you have any plans here?  

Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------
Scott Kurz
WebSphere / Open Liberty Batch and Developer Experience
skurz@xxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
jakartabatch-dev mailing list
jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartabatch-dev_______________________________________________
jakartabatch-dev mailing list
jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartabatch-dev