|
In practice I am unsure how this will proceed. If the project decides to add a Jakarta
Config 0.2 milestone will we need to approve an updated plan?
Tom
From: jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ivar Grimstad via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 9:22 AM
To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta Config 1.0
Thomas, the way I read this, and if I recall correctly when it was discussed in the spec committee is that this is a plan review for Jakarta Config 1. 0 with a milestone release (Jakarta Config 0. 1) as one of the elements of the plan. +1, EE4J
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Thomas, the way I read this, and if I recall correctly when it was discussed in the spec committee is that this is a plan review for Jakarta Config 1.0 with a milestone release (Jakarta Config 0.1) as one of the elements of the plan.
This looks to be a plan review for 0.1 release. Is that true and the ballot subject is incorrect for 1.0?
Tom
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee, I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Config. The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to approve the plan. The relevant materials
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,
I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Config.
The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to approve the
plan.
The relevant materials are available here:
https://deploy-preview-580--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/
Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Thursday, January 26th, 2023, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but
only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Red Hat, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant
Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Andrew Pielage
Senior Software Engineer
Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications
UK:+44 800 538 5490 | Int: +1 888 239 8941
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payara is a proud recipient of the prestigious Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade 2021
Payara
Services Limited,
Registered office: Unit
11, Malvern Hills Science Park, Geraldine
Road, Malvern, WR14
3SZ
Registered in England and Wales: 09998946 | VAT: GB 193854467 | www.payara.fish | info@xxxxxxxxxxx | @Payara_Fish
If at any time you would
like to unsubscribe from Payara communications, simply respond to this email with 'Unsubscribe' in the title, or instantly unsubscribe from all types of communication here.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate |
Eclipse Foundation
Eclipse Foundation
- Community. Code. Collaboration.
|
