Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [External] : Re: [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta EE 10 Core Profile
  • From: Jan Supol <jan.supol@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:53:06 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; 1; spf=pass; dmarc=pass action=none; dkim=pass; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=wUyjV+P+BpbdSzz63BiLbhlwBRC34ppLvDYRmLCCCrA=; b=ISIYrx6LfbUufszMOdu2JrNrYk2gXe9V/2/uvKz0/3b5CK9WiTcu3X+Uv0uqTd35kuOiskPnMBzl4NHB7O/pEY3KCaOg78ZiJ/LpE0+b8sGRSDi1no5L9PmvChLaeth4fHov3kAjCYpMQDWM0T5rDKrHCgPoy5TglAZfwdnLX3ZIBKytW20qTS3s5Zone5Zifrq12pJx6D5w/AlvQgzgmIrDMQVjfj/cCAb2F+IFI4/yADJPkZn+xHWcCoeQaKwKQkUBkc6ro06w7elz68NHcpuAsQMv8kTlTfMVeZnEE6zIo75SQNzst47x6NFe5pzCUXfmZUzZmB4RxeOdkSQszg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901;; cv=none; b=VIOYOVWhKcD4hnvBrMF9u76CIg/ijQw4TZP4YdWab6tkWLqt+lIsdR1Pa5w44U2USVNt9L2r4KTu9PFZqWEFRCNT/rAoAYbba6iYqKpE312n1c+q13wG7VBGkxNz+Nt9wDnRrOA/RbE44m3Fqunfsic/X0vvXGn38Ib0/s/MpMJ4WaTV9CW8mJc1SqE5ried8HqaGuWxo5uJ5OPNg5H0TMBOL9ySvO8oT3S8oCiL/Zo/DoB3Y5+5ELP1RJZlBlSXRk6g7Fffxm3Hs18bddaGgGHQwJxkOY3Tv2Gl3xKruSQVV6SvL2+BRkw3GQ6spFA5dCHgbMDJeM3q4n50W1RX+Q==
  • Delivered-to:
  • List-archive: <>
  • List-help: <>
  • List-subscribe: <>, <>
  • List-unsubscribe: <>, <>
  • Msip_labels:
  • Thread-index: AQHYrGliJ+HPg6fwAUi/NVlJvTOJw62n47rY
  • Thread-topic: [] [External] : Re: [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta EE 10 Core Profile

I am sorry, perhaps I do understand this piggyback CQs wrong. The piggyback CQ is merely a duplicate CQ already filed by any other project, correct? But there are no CQs for the dependencies filed by ANY project to piggyback from.


From: <> on behalf of Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 5:29 AM
To: Jakarta specification discussions <>
Subject: Re: [] [External] : Re: [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta EE 10 Core Profile
I can't see that this usage would be anything other than a piggyback CQ, which according to this:

Does not require a new CQ.

On Aug 9, 2022 at 3:07:58 PM, Jan Supol <jan.supol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The core profile TCK has the following dependencies:


But there are no CQs for those. Is the release review checking only CQs that are actually filed? Or are only the implementation projects required to file the CQs?


From: <> on behalf of Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 6:07 PM
To: Jakarta specification discussions <>
Subject: [External] : Re: [] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta EE 10 Core Profile
+1, PMC


On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 3:26 PM Emily Jiang via <> wrote:
A quick reminder for other working group members to vote! Please note this vote will be concluded on August 15, 2022!
Thank you

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 4:32 PM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

  I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta EE 10 Core Profile.

  The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

  The relevant materials are available here:

  Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on August 15, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

  The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

  Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Emily Jiang


_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top