Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [BALLOT][Creation Review] Jakarta Data

Hi David,

Note that this is the creation review for a specification project. They will be required to file a plan review for a specification (version) later.
Stating the Java version on the main page of a spec project doesn't make sense, since there will be different versions for different versions of the specifications. 
The items you suggest should be provided for a spec version page, e.g /data/1.0

For now, I think we should let the project gather, discuss, and then decide how to proceed. A scope statement is enough at this stage.


On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 8:26 AM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since there typically is no plan review for new projects, can we get more than two sentences for the description?

Shoot for 2 paragraphs.  Some ideas that could provide more detail:
  - what specifications you intend to build upon/leverage, 
  - anticipated java version
  - what goals might you approach early and what you think might be out of scope for now or forever
  - who would be ideal implementors (give your best sales pitch)

There's been good discussion, so it should be easy.

David Blevins

On Jul 19, 2022, at 3:29 AM, Emily Jiang via <> wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve and ratify the creation of the Jakarta Data project.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to finalize the project creation (as defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on July 26, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.


_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

Back to the top