Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[] [BALLOT RESULT] Release Review for Jakarta Security 3.0 - take 2


I declare this ballot closed and I am pleased to announce the successful completion of the Release Ballot for Jakarta Security 3.0. The results are summarized below.

My thanks for the members for their review and ballots. My congratulations to the Security team.

I will update the Specifications page to indicate these results and we will now proceed through the final release checklist.

Release Review
Representative Representative for: Vote
Kenji Kazumura Fujitsu +1
Tom Watson, Emily Jiang IBM +1
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov Oracle +1
Andrew Pielage, Petr Aubrecht Payara +1
David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monteiro Tomitribe +1
Ivar Grimstad EE4J PMC +1
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn Verburg Participant Members no vote
Werner Keil Committer Members no vote
Jun Qian Enterprise Members +1
Zhai Luchao Enterprise Members +1

Total 8

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:20 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonteiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Security 3.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release. The first attempt was missing the user guide, this should fix the issue.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on June 13th, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.


Back to the top