[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : [BALLOT - COMPLETE] Release Review for Jakarta Concurrency 3.0
|
I am pleased to announce the successful conclusion of the release
review ballot for Jakarta Concurrency 3.0. My congratulations to
the Concurrency committer team! My thanks to all committee members
for reviewing the proposed final specification and casting their
votes.
The final ballot tabulation is
Release
Review
|
Representative |
Representative
for: |
Vote |
Kenji Kazumura |
Fujitsu |
+1
|
Tom Watson, Emily Jiang |
IBM |
+1
|
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov |
Oracle |
+1
|
Andrew Pielage, Petr Aubrecht |
Payara |
+1
|
David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monteiro |
Tomitribe+ |
+1
|
Ivar Grimstad |
EE4J PMC |
+1
|
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn Verburg |
Participant Members |
+1
|
Werner Keil |
Committer Members |
+1
|
Jun Qian |
Enterprise Members |
+1
|
Zhai Luchao |
Enterprise
Members |
+1
|
|
Total |
10 |
We will now proceed to finish publishing this release as a final
specification version.
All the best,
-- Ed
On 4/27/2022 1:06 PM, Ed Bratt wrote:
Greetings
Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
I need your vote
to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Concurrency
3.0 as part of the Jakarta EE
Platform 10 release.
The JESP/EFSP
requires a successful ballot
of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the
products of this release as a Final Specification (as that
term is defined in the EFSP).
The relevant
materials are available here:
Per the process,
this will be a fourteen day ballot,
ending on May 11th, 2022 that requires a
Super-majority positive vote of the Specification
Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community
input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification
Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification
Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE
Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle,
Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, Shandong Cvicse Middleware
Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC,
Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification
Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested.
Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1
(reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support
your vote will be appreciated.
Please Note
-- TCK links in the preview render are for reader
convenience and will be updated if this ballot is
successful.
--
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!OKMJcciStHe_cvpxgoEAvjLlfU5_tmlcXIYKEV46aDewONaRscW1nEqDWR3S4E96pkv6Evijl5BRKpK7$