Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Servlet 6.0


Due to the merge/revert-merge, the preview in the email does not reflect the content. The preview from the PR with the fixed links gives the closest to truth content, I guess.
Here it is:

Review comments:
- Links to the Schemas are missing
- Schemas were not published. I have taken care of that now, so they are available here:
- Plan review ballot results are missing on the page. These must be added along with the review ballot results. For reference:  
- SHA256 of the staged TCK does not match the one documented in the CCR and TCK Results

The schemas links and plan review results can be updated after the ballot, but the SHA in CCR must be fixed before I can approve this.


On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:24 AM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (community input)

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:05 PM Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 13:58, marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

  I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Servlets 6.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.

  The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

  The relevant materials are available here:

  Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on May 11, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

  The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

  Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Best Regards,
Marcelo Ancelmo
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

Back to the top