Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT DISCONTINUED] Release Review for Jakarta R

[Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The Jakarta RESTful Web Services project has decided to withdraw from this release review in order to handle a TCK challenge resulting in an updated TCK. This ballot is therefore declared invalid and concluded immediately as defined by the JESP.

There is absolutely no drama associated with this. It is all according to the process.

The ballot will be started again as soon as the project team communicates that they are done with their updates and are ready for their release review.

Thanks to those that have already voted on this ballot!

(You will, however, be required to cast your vote again on the new ballot when this is started.)

Ivar

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 3:15 AM 翟鲁超 <zhai_lchao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1
Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.
Zhai Luchao


发件人："Ivar Grimstad" <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
发送日期：2022-03-14 17:00:00
收件人："Jakarta specification disccusions" <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
主题：[jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta RESTful Web Services 3.1

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta RESTful Web Services 3.1 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/430

- https://deploy-preview-430--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/restful-ws/3.1/

Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Monday, March 28, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Ivar

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.