Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [BALLOT] Jakarta Interceptors 2.1 Plan Review

+1 (Payara)

Caveats/nitpicks if following the PR template to the letter:
  • Title is not in the form of "Jakarta Wombat X.Y (under development)" - the "(under development)" is missing
  • The list of representatives needs updating: Matt Gill no longer a representative for Payara; Dan Bandera and Kevin Sutter still listed as representatives for IBM when it should presumably be Tom Watson & Emily Jiang
    • The ballot tables don't strictly match that defined in the template
  • Doesn't include minimum Java SE version


Andrew Pielage

Java Developer at Payara Services Ltd

Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications

From: <> on behalf of Emily Jiang via <>
Sent: 19 January 2022 10:20
To: Jakarta specification discussions <>
Cc: Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [] [BALLOT] Jakarta Interceptors 2.1 Plan Review

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta Interceptors 2.1

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Wednesday January 26, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.


Back to the top