| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta JSP 3.1 |
+1
Werner
Seems I have not voted on it myself yet, but now only Red Hat and Tomitribe seem to be missing.
Von: Kevin Sutter
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2021 16:02
An: Jakarta specification discussions
Betreff: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta JSP 3.1
+1 (IBM)
As stated in the PR, the deployment preview is all messed up, but I think that's just a hiccup with the netlify deployment processing. Not a big deal. I also commented on a nit with a reference to the Jakarta EE 9 release plan, but that's easily updated before we merge. Looks good. Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)
From: Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx>
To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06/16/2021 16:29
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta JSP 3.1
Sent by: "jakarta.ee-spec" <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta JSP 3.1
The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback. Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.
The relevant materials are available here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/366
https://deploy-preview-366--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/jsp/3.1
Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Wednesday, June 23, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec