Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0

Hi all,

I declare this ballot complete and approved. The summary of the votes is below.

The project team and Specification Committee may now engage to complete the release.


RepresentativeRepresentative for:Vote
Kenji KazumuraFujitsu+1
Dan Bandera, Kevin SutterIBM+1
Ed Bratt, Dmitry KornilovOracle+1
Andrew Pielage, Matt GillPayara+1
Scott Stark, Mark LittleRed Hat+1
David Blevins, Jean-Louis MonteiroTomitribe+1
Ivar GrimstadEE4J PMC+1
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn VerburgParticipant Members+1
Werner KeilCommitter Members+1
Dr. Jun QianEnterprise Members+1

Best Regards,
Marcelo Ancelmo

On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 17:57, Andrew Pielage <andrew.pielage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (Payara)

Andrew Pielage

Java Developer at Payara Services Ltd

Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications

From: <> on behalf of marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 31 May 2021 21:01
To: Jakarta specification discussions <>
Subject: [] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta XML Binding 4.0

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Monday, Jun 7th , that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committee Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Best Regards,
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top