Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0

+1(Primeton)


Jun Qian


 
 
 
------------------ Original ------------------
Date:  Fri, Jun 4, 2021 05:25 AM
To:  "Jakarta specification discussions"<jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
Subject:  Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0
 
+1 (IBM)

Via the PR, I am asking Lukas to explicitly identify the proposed updates that are causing the major version update.  Minor update to the Release Plan that does not affect the desired content of the proposed release.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)




From:        marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        05/31/2021 15:01
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0
Sent by:        "jakarta.ee-spec" <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>




Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta XML Binding 4.0

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/357
https://deploy-preview-357--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Monday, Jun 7th , that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committee Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Best Regards,
Marcelo Ancelmo
Twitter: https://twitter.com/marceloancelmo
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marceloancelmo/
SlideShare: https://www.slideshare.net/marceloancelmo

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec





Back to the top