Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT APPROVED] Plan Review for Jakarta RESTful

[Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

I declare this ballot complete and approved. The summary of the votes is below.

The project team and Specification Committee may now engage to complete the release.

Congratulations!

Representative	Representative for:	Vote
Kenji Kazumura	Fujitsu	+1
Dan Bandera, Kevin Sutter	IBM	+1
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov	Oracle	+1
Andrew Pielage, Matt Gill	Payara	+1
Scott Stark, Mark Little	Red Hat	-1
David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monteiro	Tomitribe	+1
Ivar Grimstad	EE4J PMC	+1
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn Verburg	Participant Members	+1
Werner Keil	Committer Members	-1
Dr. Jun Qian	Enterprise Members	+1
	Total	8

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:43 PM Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 (IBM)

Although I understand RH's question about a potential "JAX-RS Lite" for 4.0, I think we'll need to flush out the requirements for the Core Profile and CDI Lite before requiring changes to the JAX-RS 4.0 Plan.  We can always adjust as the requirements become more clear.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:        Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        05/25/2021 01:57
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta RESTful Web Services 4.0
Sent by:        "jakarta.ee-spec" <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

">

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta RESTful Web Services 4.0.

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/351
https://deploy-preview-351--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/restful-ws/4.0/

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Tuesday, June 1, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation- Community. Code. Collaboration. _______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.