Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML WebServices 4.0

+1

 

Werner

 

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

 

Von: 钱军
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2021 08:55
An: Jakarta specification discussions
Betreff: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML WebServices 4.0

 

Hi,

 

This is a reminder that this ballot will close on Monday May 17th. I have not received votes from the following members:

 

- Fujitsu

- Oracle

- Red Hat

- Werner Keil

 

Please give your votes before the ballot ending.

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Jun Qian

 

 




钱军

普元阿米加

系我

 

 

 

------------------ Original ------------------

Date:  Mon, May 10, 2021 11:30 AM

To:  "Jakarta specification discussions"<jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>;

Subject:  [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Web Services 4.0

 

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

 

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta XML Web Services 4.0 

 

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

 

The relevant materials are available here:

 

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/359

https://deploy-preview-359--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/

 

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Monday, May 17rd, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

 

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

 

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Jun Qian

Primeton Software

 




钱军

普元阿米加

系我

 

 

 

-

 


Back to the top