Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta SOAP withAttachments 3.0

+1

Werner

 

I thought I voted on it already but at least in this thread I cannot see the message.

 

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

 

Von: Andrew Pielage
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2021 11:50
An: Jakarta specification disccusions
Betreff: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta SOAP withAttachments 3.0

 

+1 (Payara)

 

Andrew Pielage

Java Developer at Payara Services Ltd

Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications

 

 

From: jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 30 April 2021 18:37
To: Jakarta specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta SOAP with Attachments 3.0

 

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta SOAP with Attachments 3.0

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Friday May 7, 2021, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks

--  Ed Bratt, Oracle

 


Back to the top