Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT APPROVED] Plan Review for Jakarta Persiste

[Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I declare this ballot complete and approved. The summary of the votes is below. I've marked the corresponding PRs as approved and will merge shortly.

The project team and Specification Committee may now engage to complete the release.

Congratulations!

Ivar

Representative	Representative for:	Vote
Kenji Kazumura	Fujitsu	+1
Dan Bandera, Kevin Sutter	IBM	+1
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov	Oracle	+1
Andrew Pielage, Matt Gill	Payara	+1
Scott Stark, Mark Little	Red Hat	no vote
David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monteiro	Tomitribe	+1
Ivar Grimstad	EE4J PMC	+1
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn Verburg	Participant Members	+1
Werner Keil	Committer Members	+1
Dr. Jun Qian	Enterprise Members	+1
	Total	9

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta Persistence 3.1.

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/360

https://deploy-preview-360--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/persistence/3.1/

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Wednesday, April 28, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.