Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta JSON Binding 3.0

+0 (IBM)

I still might change my vote before the deadline, but I'd like to understand what is breaking to force a major version update (3.0).  And, what is the potential impact to customers.  Updating the major version of a Spec needs to be well thought out and documented.  The team probably does have a good understand, but I just didn't see the justification in the PR.  I have documented my request in the PR:

Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)

From:        Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification disccusions <>
Date:        04/23/2021 02:21
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] [] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta JSON Binding 3.0
Sent by:        "" <>

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta JSON Binding 3.0.

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Friday, April 30, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.



Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation- Community. Code. Collaboration. _______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top