Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta MVC 2.0

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 (IBM) with a caveat...

I found a couple
of minor items while reviewing this MVC 2.0 Release:  https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/315#issuecomment-742526640

The main item
that is still outstanding is that the license link at the bottom of the
javadoc pages gets a 404 error.  To correct this, new staging artifacts
would need to be posted.  Since nobody else has found this error yet
with multiple +1's already logged, I'm okay with Ivar restaging the MVC
2.0 artifacts with the corrected license link (and version title).  Otherwise,
Ivar would have to go forward with what is already posted and then do a
separate 2.0.1 release to correct the javadoc.  That seems like overkill.
 But, let's see what others think...

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       Scott
Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Jakarta
specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       12/03/2020
19:17
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
[jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta MVC 2.0
Sent
by:        jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta MVC 2.0 as a standalone release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/315

https://deploy-preview-315--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/mvc/2.0/

Per the process, this will be a fourteen day ballot, ending on Dec 17 2020 that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks …_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec